Feminism Against Crime Control: On Sexual Subordination and State Apologism

Historical Materialism 26 (2):123-148 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Its critics call it ‘feminism-as-crime-control’, or ‘Governance Feminism’, diagnosing it as a pernicious form of identity politics. Its advocates call it taking sexual violence seriously – by which they mean wielding the power of the state to ‘punish perpetrators’ and ‘protect vulnerable women’. Both sides agree that this approach follows from the radical feminist analysis of sexual violence most strikingly formulated by Catharine MacKinnon. The aim of this paper is to rethink the Governance Feminism debate by questioning this common presupposition. I ask whether taking MacKinnon’s analysis of sexual violence seriously might, in fact, itself give us reason to be critical of political strategies that embrace the punitive state. By raising this question, I hope to persuade radical feminists to listen to critics of carceral politics rather than dismissing them as rape apologists, and critics of carceral politics to listen to radical feminists rather than dismissing them as state apologists.


Added to PP

794 (#21,468)

6 months
164 (#25,305)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Koshka Duff
Nottingham University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations