International Theory 5 (2):177–212 (2013)

Authors
Pavel Dufek
Masaryk University
Abstract
The article deals with a pivotal conceptual distinction employed in philosophical discussions about global justice. Cosmopolitans claim that arguing from the perspective of moral cosmopolitanism does not necessarily entail defending a global coercive political authority, or a "world-state", and suggest that ambitious political and economic (social) goals implied in moral cosmopolitanism may be achieved via some kind of non-hierarchical, dispersed and/or decentralised institutional arrangements. I argue that insofar as moral cosmopolitans retain "strong" moral claims, this is an untenable position, and that the goals of cosmopolitan justice, as explicated by its major proponents, require nothing less than a global state-like entity with coercive powers. My background ambition is to supplement some existing works questioning the notion of "governance without government" with an argument that goes right to the conceptual heart of cosmopolitan thought. To embed my central theoretical argument in real-world developments, I draw on some recent scholarship regarding the nature of international organizations, European Union, or transnational democratization. Finally I suggest that only after curbing moral aspirations in the first place can a more self-consciously moderate position be constructed, one that will carry practical and feasible implications for institutional design.
Keywords global justice  moral cosmopolitanism  political cosmopolitanism  international theory  world state  democracy  international organisations
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

World Government.Catherine Lu - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Global Citizenship as the Completion of Cosmopolitanism.Luis Cabrera - 2008 - Journal of International Political Theory 4 (1):84-104.
Cosmopolitanism with Room for Nationalism.Win-Chiat Lee - 2012 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (2):279-293.
Cosmopolitanism, Minimal Morality, and the World-State.Christopher Yorke - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:873-880.
Cosmopolitan Justice and Minority Rights: The Case of Minority Nations.Ferran Requejo - 2012 - Ramon Llull Journal of Applied Ethics 3 (3):83.
Kant's Moral and Political Cosmopolitanism.Pauline Kleingeld - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (1):14-23.
Six Varieties of Cosmopolitanism in Late Eighteenth-Century Germany.Pauline Kleingeld - 1999 - Journal of the History of Ideas 60 (3):505-524.
Cosmopolitan Pacifism.Soran Reader - 2007 - Journal of Global Ethics 3 (1):87 – 103.
The Case for World Government.Louis P. Pojman - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Research 31:59-80.
The Moral Case for Institutional Cosmopolitanism.Louis Pojman - 2004 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):3-28.
The Case for World Government.Louis P. Pojman - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Research 31:59-80.
Cosmopolitan Care.Sarah Clark Miller - 2010 - Ethics and Social Welfare 4 (2):145-157.
Dialogic Cosmopolitanism and Global Justice.Eduard Christiaan Jordaan - 2009 - International Studies Review 11 (4):736--748.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-07-09

Total views
241 ( #37,165 of 2,421,440 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #21,107 of 2,421,440 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes