In defence of transcendental idealism: reply to McWherter

Journal of Critical Realism 17 (5):514-518 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I recently argued that critical realists ought to adopt transcendental idealism in favour of Bhaskar’s transcendental realism. In response, Dustin McWherter presents two arguments against transcendental idealism: it is inferior to transcendental realism because it cannot account for the epistemic significance of experimentation, and it is internally inconsistent because it affirms the existence of things-in-themselves. This brief reply defends transcendental idealism against both objections.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-10-12

Downloads
362 (#60,240)

6 months
78 (#76,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Guus Duindam
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Citations of this work

Idealism and existence: second response to Duindam.Dustin McWherter - 2018 - Journal of Critical Realism 17 (5):519-522.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Critique of Practical Reason.Immanuel Kant (ed.) - 1788 - New York,: Hackett Publishing Company.
Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1998 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Edited by J. M. D. Meiklejohn. Translated by Paul Guyer & Allen W. Wood.
Critique of pure reason.Immanuel Kant - 2007 - In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late modern philosophy: essential readings with commentary. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 449-451.
Critique of Pure Reason.Immanuel Kant - 1781 - Mineola, New York: Macmillan Company. Edited by J. M. D. Meiklejohn.
Critique of Pure Reason.Wolfgang Schwarz - 1966 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 26 (3):449-451.

View all 15 references / Add more references