The Problem of Female Genital Cutting: Bridging Secular and Islamic Bioethical Perspectives

Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 62 (2):273-300 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent events in the United States and beyond have brought debates over the practice of female genital cutting back into public, academic, and policy discourses.1 In April 2017, Jumana Nagarwala, a Michigan-based emergency medicine physician from a small Shia sect known as the Dawoodi Bohra, was charged with performing female genital mutilation. The procedure is prohibited by federal law and defined as the circumcision, excision, or infibulation of the whole or any part of the female genitalia under the age of 18. Nagarwala argues that she did not mutilate, but rather performed a variation of a religious ritual, termed Khatna, which involves the nicking...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting.Dilinie Herbert - 2013 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 19 (3):1.
Female Genital Cutting : Who Defines Whose Culture as Unethical?Naomi Onsongo - 2017 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 10 (2):105-123.
The child’s right to genital integrity.Kate Goldie Townsend - 2019 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 46 (7):878-898.
Negotiating Cultural Rights to Affirm Human Rights.Mary Nyangweso - 2016 - Journal of Religion and Violence 4 (1):39-57.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-01

Downloads
10 (#1,129,009)

6 months
4 (#698,851)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references