Simple sentences, substitution, and intuitions • by Jennifer Saul

Analysis 69 (1):174-176 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Philosophers of language have long recognized that in opaque contexts, such as those involving propositional attitude reports, substitution of co-referring names may not preserve truth value. For example, the name ‘Clark Kent’ cannot be substituted for ‘Superman’ in a context like:1. Lois believes that Superman can flywithout a change in truth value. In an earlier paper , Jennifer Saul demonstrated that substitution failure could also occur in ‘simple sentences’ where none of the ordinary opacity-producing conditions existed, such as:2. Superman leaps more tall buildings than Clark Kent does.Accounts focusing on opacity were unable to explain our ‘anti-substitution intuitions’ in such cases.In Simple Sentences, Substitution, and Intuitions, Saul extends her earlier work. She provides a comprehensive presentation and criticism of recent accounts of simple sentence substitution failure, and proposes a new approach drawing on psychological evidence about cognitive processing. Saul's purpose is not merely to solve the substitution puzzle cases, but to make …



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Puzzling pairs.Michael Nelson - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):109 - 119.
Intensionality: What are intensional transitives?Jennifer M. Saul - 2002 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 76 (1):101–119.
Substitution and simple sentences.Jennifer M. Saul - 1997 - Analysis 57 (2):102–108.


Added to PP

139 (#134,614)

6 months
5 (#648,401)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jennifer Duke-Yonge
Macquarie University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Substitution and simple sentences.Jennifer M. Saul - 1997 - Analysis 57 (2):102–108.

Add more references