Philosophical Psychology 23 (6):821-843 (2010)

Some evolutionary psychologists claim that humans are good at creating superstimuli, and that many pleasure technologies are detrimental to our reproductive fitness. Most of the evolutionary psychological literature makes use of some version of Lorenz and Tinbergen’s largely embryonic conceptual framework to make sense of supernormal stimulation and bias exploitation in humans. However, the early ethological concept “superstimulus” was intimately connected to other erstwhile core ethological notions, such as the innate releasing mechanism, sign stimuli and the fixed action pattern, notions that nowadays have, for the most part, been discarded by ethologists. The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, we will reconnect the discussion of superstimuli in humans with more recent theoretical ethological literature on stimulus selection and supernormal stimulation. This will allow for a reconceptualisation of evolutionary psychology’s formulation of (supernormal) stimulus selection in terms of domain-specificity and modularity. Second, we will argue that bias exploitation in a cultural species differs substantially from bias exploitation in non-cultural animals. We will explore several of those differences, and explicate why they put important constraints on the use of the superstimulus concept in the evolutionary social sciences
Keywords MIND  PHYSIOLOGY  SELF-CONTROL  SEXUAL SELECTION  SIGNALS  CALLS  Bias Exploitation  Cultural Evolution  Evolutionary Psychology  Superstimulus  Theoretical Ethology  CULTURAL-EVOLUTION
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09515089.2010.529048
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,393
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Study of Instinct.N. Tinbergen - 1954 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 5 (17):72-76.

View all 28 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Social Norms and Human Normative Psychology.Daniel Kelly & Taylor Davis - 2018 - Social Philosophy and Policy 35 (1):54-76.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Defending Laws in the Social Sciences.Harold Kincaid - 1990 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (1):56?83.
Evolutionary Theory and the Social Sciences.Robert L. Burgess & Peter C. M. Molenaar - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):20-21.
Evolutionary Theory and the Riddle of the Universe.Denny Borsboom - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):351-351.
An Evidence-Based Study of the Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences.Edouard Machery & Kara Cohen - 2012 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63 (1):177-226.


Added to PP index

Total views
45 ( #237,471 of 2,448,992 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #443,144 of 2,448,992 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes