Rules and similarity as conscious contents with distinctive roles in theory

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):24-24 (2005)
Abstract
Difficulty of distinguishing rules and similarity in categorization comes from reliance on relatively simple manipulation-response designs and a style of modeling with abstract parameters, rather than assessment of intervening and controlling mental states. This commentary proposes a strategy in which rules and similarity would be distinguished by their different roles in a theory interrelating reportable conscious contents in deliberative categorization.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X05330019
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,349
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Rules, Similarity, and Threshold Logic.Włodzisław Duch - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):23-23.
In Search of Radical Similarity.Oscar Vilarroya - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):35-35.
The Rules Versus Similarity Distinction.Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):1-14.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
14 ( #342,089 of 2,193,746 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #28,093 of 2,193,746 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature