Vivarium 43 (1):7-62 (2005)
The degree of realism that Duns Scotus understood his formal distinction to have implied is a matter of dispute going back to the fourteenth century. Both modern and medieval commentators alike have seen Scotus's later, Parisian treament of the formal distinction as less realist in the sense that it would deny any extra-mentally separate formalities or realities. This less realist reading depends in large part on a question known to scholars only in the highly corrupt edition of Luke Wadding, where it is printed as the first of the otherwise spurious Quaestiones miscellaneae de formalitatibus. The present study examines this question in detail. Cited by Scotus's contemporaries as the Quaestio logica Scoti, we establish that it was a special disputation held by Scotus at Paris in response to criticisms of his use of the formal distinction in God, identify its known manuscripts, and provide an analysis based upon a corrected text, showing in particular the total unreliability of the Wadding edition. Our analysis shows that the Logica Scoti does not absolutely prohibit an assertion of formalities as correlates of the formal distinction, even in the divine Person, so long as their non-identity is properly qualified. That is, the positing of formalities does not of itself entail an unqualified or absolute distinction.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Simplicity’s Deficiency: Al-Ghazali’s Defense of the Divine Attributes and Contemporary Trinitarian Metaphysics.Nicholas Martin - forthcoming - Topoi:1-9.
Similar books and articles
Scotus and Ockham.Colin Connors - 2009 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:141-153.
Duns Scotus’s Action Theory in the Context of His Angelology.Tobias Hoffmann - 2010 - In Ludger Honnefelder (ed.), Johannes Duns Scotus 1308–2008: Die philosophischen Perspektiven seines Werkes / Investigations into his Philosophy. Proceedings of “The Quadruple Congress” on John Duns Scotus, part 3. Franciscan Institute Publications; Aschendorff.
The Development of the Doctrine of the Formal Distinction in the Lectura Prima of John Duns Scotus.R. G. Wengert - 1965 - The Monist 49 (4):571-587.
The Formal Distinction of Duns Scotus and its Philosophic Applications.Maurice Grajewski - 1945 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 20:145-156.
Descartes's Conceptual Distinction and its Ontological Import.Justin Skirry - 2004 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (2):121-144.
Scotus's Realist Conception of the Categories: His Legacy to Late Medieval Debates.Giorgio Pini - 2005 - Vivarium 43 (1):63-110.
The Physics of Duns Scotus: The Scientific Context of a Theological Vision.Richard Cross - 1998 - Clarendon Press.
The Distinction Between Nature and Will in Duns Scotus.Tobias Hoffmann - 1999 - Archives D’Histoire Doctrinale Et Littéraire du Moyen Âge 66:189-224.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads120 ( #41,137 of 2,177,852 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #73,407 of 2,177,852 )
How can I increase my downloads?