Philosophy 80 (1):141-144 (2005)

Abstract
Ulrich Meyer's objections to Dummett's arguments on the time continuum fail because he takes Dummett to endorse Hume's atomistic doctrine that events are ‘loose and separate’, In fact, Dummett rejects this doctrine. He used it in his original article only to indicate that certain implications which are conceptually possible fom the point of view of the classical model of time are not actually conceptually possible.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0031819105000094
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,107
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Tense Logic.Ulrich Meyer - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (6):406-419.
On Time Chez Dummett.Jeremy Butterfield - 2012 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 8 (1):77-102.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
92 ( #118,335 of 2,454,643 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,377 of 2,454,643 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes