Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):416-424 (2008)

Authors
Travis Dumsday
Concordia University of Edmonton
Abstract
It is typically thought that miracles, if they occur, can provide evidence for the truth of religious doctrine. But what if different miracles occur attesting to the truth of different and incompatible religions? How is one to decide between the truth of the supposed revelations? Much of Locke’s short work, A Discourse of Miracles, is concerned with this question. Here I summarize and evaluate Locke’s answer
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0739-7046
DOI 10.5840/faithphil200825442
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,826
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Marvels, Miracles, and Mundane Order.S. Buckle - 2001 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (1):1 – 31.
Proofs of Miracles and Miracles as Proofs.Richard L. Purtill - 1976 - Christian Scholar’s Review 6.
Miracles.Paul Fitzgerald - 1985 - Philosophical Forum 17 (1):48 - 64.
Hume and Miracles.Matthew C. Bagger - 1997 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 35 (2):237 - 251.
A Moral Argument Against Miracles.James A. Keller - 1995 - Faith and Philosophy 12 (1):54-78.
Miracles as Evidence Against the Existence of God.Christine Overall - 1985 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):347-353.
Martin on Miracles.Michael Almeida - 2007 - Philo 10 (1):27-34.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
75 ( #139,080 of 2,438,799 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #283,058 of 2,438,799 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes