Reciprocity: Nuclear Risk and Responsibility

ProtoSociology 32:166-183 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Focusing on the March 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident, this article argues that there is or can be a form of reciprocity between the victims of a catastrophe and society at large to the extent that victims become the occasion and rationale for social reforms. The victims’ contribution to society in this case is the simple fact of being victims. Such a form of reciprocity requires a particular relation to time which Jean-Pierre Dupuy has recently analyzed. In the case of modern risks such as nuclear risk, the contribution of the victims is not only to a better future, but also takes place in the present by rendering patent risks which, as Ulrich Beck argued, though they are known tend to remain socially invisible.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Failed Nuclear Risk Governance.Hiroyuki Tosa - 2015 - ProtoSociology 32:125-149.
Two Conceptions of Justice as Reciprocity.Christie Hartley - 2014 - Social Theory and Practice 40 (3):409-432.
论积极的中庸——进取互利.Li-Jing Wang & Xin Xie - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:601-612.
Serial Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement.Michael Moody - 2008 - Sociological Theory 26 (2):130-151.
Risk and Responsibility: A Complex and Evolving Relationship.Céline Kermisch - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):91-102.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-24

Downloads
26 (#592,813)

6 months
11 (#226,803)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references