Using Natural-Kind Essentialism to Defend Dispositionalism

Erkenntnis 78 (4):869-880 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Marc Lange and Ann Whittle have independently developed an important challenge to dispositionalism, arguing that dispositions are reducible to primitive subjunctive facts. I argue in reply that by pairing dispositionalism with a certain version of natural-kind essentialism, their objection can be overcome. Moreover, such a marriage carries further advantages for the dispositionalist. My aim is therefore two-fold: to defend dispositionalism, and to give the dispositionalist some new motivation to adopt natural-kind essentialism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 106,716

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-02-11

Downloads
170 (#146,171)

6 months
4 (#1,007,739)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Travis Dumsday
Concordia University of Edmonton

References found in this work

A World of States of Affairs.D. M. Armstrong - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nature's Metaphysics: Laws and Properties.Alexander Bird - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Scientific Essentialism.Brian Ellis - 2001 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
What is a Law of Nature?David Malet Armstrong - 1983 - Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Sydney Shoemaker.

View all 43 references / Add more references