Causal thinking in science: How scientists and students interpret the unexpected

In M. Gorman, R. Tweney, D. Gooding & A. Kincannon (eds.), Scientific and Technological Thinking. Erlbaum. pp. 57--79 (2005)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 49,987
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Visualizing Scientific Inference.David C. Gooding - 2010 - Topics in Cognitive Science 2 (1):15-35.
Unexpected Findings and Promoting Monocausal Claims, a Cautionary Tale.Samantha Marie Copeland - 2017 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 23 (5):1055-1061.
Introduction to Cognition in Science and Technology.Michael E. Gorman - 2009 - Topics in Cognitive Science 1 (4):675-685.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Teaching Philosophy of Science to Scientists: Why, What and How.Till Grüne-Yanoff - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 4 (1):115-134.
Testing Philosophical Claims About Science.David Hull - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:468 - 475.
The Complexity of Science.H. P. P. Lotter - 1999 - Koers 64 (4):499-520.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-31

Total views
5 ( #1,091,733 of 2,324,061 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #688,650 of 2,324,061 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes