Do Firms With Unique Competencies for Rescuing Victims of Human Catastrophes Have Special Obligations?

Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (2):185-210 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Firms possessing a unique competency to rescue the victims of a human catastrophe have a minimum moral obligation to devote substantial resources toward best efforts to aid the victims. The minimum amount that firms should devote to rescue is the largest sum of their most recent year’s investment in social initiatives, their five-year trend, their industry’s average, or the national average. Financial exigency may justify a lower level of investment. Alternative social investments may be continued if they have an equally compelling rationale. These duties apply to the global pharmaceutical companies in the context of the AIDS pandemic in sub-Saharan Africa.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

AIDS and Culture: The Case for an African Information Identity.Kendra S. Albright - 2007 - International Review of Information Ethics 7:1.
Hiv and aids in Africa: Social, political, and economic realities.A. Dhai - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (5):293-296.
The exotic and the mundane.Paul Farmer - 1990 - Human Nature 1 (4):415-446.
AIDS and Africa.Loretta M. Kopelman & Anton A. van Niekerk - 2002 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (2):139 – 142.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
36 (#432,773)

6 months
2 (#1,232,442)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

What we owe to each other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Philanthropy as strategy.A. Buchholtz, A. Carroll & D. Saiia - 2003 - Business and Society 42 (2):169-201.
Business Ethics and Extant Social Contracts.Thomas W. Dunfee - 1991 - Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (1):23-51.

View all 8 references / Add more references