Divergence of values and goals in participatory research


Public participation in scientific research has gained prominence in many scientific fields, but the theory of participatory research is still limited. In this paper, we suggest that the divergence of values and goals between academic researchers and public participants in research is key to analyzing the different forms this research takes. We examine two existing characterizations of participatory research: one in terms of public participants' role in the research, the other in terms of the virtues of the research. In our view, each of these captures an important feature of participatory research but is, on its own, limited in what features it takes into account. We introduce an expanded conception of norms of collaboration that extends to both academic researchers and public participants. We suggest that satisfying these norms requires consideration of the two groups' possibly divergent values and goals, and that a broad characterization of participatory research that starts from participants' values and goals can motivate both public participants’ role in the research and the virtues of the research. The resulting framework clarifies the similarities and differences among participatory projects and can help guide the responsible design of such projects.


Added to PP

182 (#66,625)

6 months
45 (#18,376)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Angela Potochnik
University of Cincinnati
Lucas Dunlap
University of Cincinnati
Amanda Corris
Wake Forest University
2 more

Citations of this work

The strong program in embodied cognitive science.Guilherme Sanches de Oliveira - forthcoming - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences:1-25.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Community-Based Participatory Research Postnormal Science?David Bidwell - 2009 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 34 (6):741-761.
The Importance of Participatory Virtues in the Future of Environmental Education.Matt Ferkany & Kyle Powys Whyte - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (3):419-434.