How is Neuroscience Possible?


Authors
Steven Merle Duncan
Bellevue Community College
Abstract
In this paper, I argue that neuroscience not only is not complemented, but rather is positively undermined, by the substantive commitments of materialist philosophers of mind. Thus, we can have neuroscience or "neurophilosophy" but not both. Since neuroscience is a real science, to the extent that it is in tension with materialistic neurophilosophy, the latter should be abandoned and the former retained.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Methodological Problems of Neuroscience.Nicholas Maxwell - 1985 - In David Rose & Vernon Dobson (eds.), Models of the Visual Cortex. New York: Wiley.
The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement.Pete Mandik & Andrew Brook - 2007 - Analyze and Kritik 26 (1):3-23.
What Can Neuroscience Bring to Education?Michel Ferrari - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):31-36.
The Philosophy of Neuroscience.John Bickle, Pete Mandik & Anthony Landreth - 2006 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
What Price Neurophilosophy?Eric Saidel - 1992 - Philosophy of Science Association 1:461-68.
Resisting Ruthless Reductionism: A Commentary on Bickle.Tim Bayne & Jordi FernÁndez - 2005 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (3):239-48.
Neuroscience and the Person: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action.Robert J. Russell (ed.) - 2002 - Center for Ttheology and the Natural Sciences.
Precis of Philosophy and Neuroscience: A Ruthlessly Reductive Account. [REVIEW]John Bickle - 2005 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (3):231-238.
Law and Neuroscience.Michael Freeman (ed.) - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Can Cognitive Neuroscience Ground a Science of Learning?Anthony E. Kelly - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):17-23.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-06-08

Total views
133 ( #62,198 of 2,285,631 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #71,261 of 2,285,631 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature