Ancient Philosophy 32 (1):77-86 (2012)

Authors
Matthew Duncombe
Nottingham University
Abstract
Sophist 255c14 distinguishes καθ’ αὑτά and πρὸς ἄλλα (in relation to others). Many commentators identify this with the ‘absolute’ and ‘relative’ category distinction. However, terms such as ‘same’ cannot fit into either category. Several reliable manuscripts read πρὸς ἄλληλα (in relation to each other) for πρὸς ἄλλα. I show that πρὸς ἄλληλα is a palaeographically plausible reading which accommodates the problematic terms. I then defend my reading against objections.
Keywords Plato  Categories  Absolute  Relative  Sophist  Parmenides
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0740-2007
DOI 10.5840/ancientphil20123214
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Cambridge Companion to Plato.Richard Kraut (ed.) - 1992 - Cambridge University Press.
Converse Relations.Timothy Williamson - 1985 - Philosophical Review 94 (2):249-262.
Plato on Not-Being.G. E. L. Owen - 1970 - In Gail Fine (ed.), Plato 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
A Proof in the Peri Idewn.G. E. L. Owen - 1957 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 77 (1):103-111.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-10-14

Total views
469 ( #17,950 of 2,463,174 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #22,161 of 2,463,174 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes