Authors
Nicholas Dunn
McGill University
Abstract
Kant’s distinction between the determining and reflecting power of judgment in the third Critique is not well understood in the literature. A mainstream view unifies these by making determination the telos of all acts of judgment (Longuenesse 1998). On this view, all reflection is primarily in the business of producing empirical concepts for cognition, and thus has what I call a determinative ideal. I argue that this view fails to take seriously the independence and autonomy of the ‘power of judgment’ [Urteilskraft] as a higher cognitive faculty in its own right with its own a priori principle. Instead of seeing merely reflecting judgments as failed or incomplete acts of judgment, I argue that these are in fact paradigmatic of the activity of the power of judgment. More precisely, the reflecting power of judgment just is the power of judgment. Accordingly, reflecting judgment takes precedence over determining judgment; while the former operates according to a law that it gives itself, the latter requires another higher cognitive faculty to provide its principle. On my view, reflecting judgment should be understood as the capacity for purposive subsumption—most clearly seen in the activity of mere reflection.
Keywords Kant  Judgment  Reflection  Subsumption  Faculty psychology  Longuenesse
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Kant.Paul Guyer - 2006 - Routledge.
Lectures on Anthropology.Immanuel Kant - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
Kant on the Logical Origin of Concepts.Alexandra Newton - 2015 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):456-484.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ingenio, Uso Hipotético de la Razón y Juicio Reflexionante en la Filosofía de Kant.Manuel Sánchez Rodríguez - 2012 - Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 29 (2):577-592.
Critique of Judgment.Immanuel Kant - 1790 - Barnes & Noble.
The Antinomy of Teleological Judgment.Ina Goy - 2015 - Studi Kantiani 28:65-88.
Kant on Practical Judgment.Ted Di Maria - 2019 - International Philosophical Quarterly 59 (2):219-235.
Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays.Paul Guyer (ed.) - 2003 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Causation in Reflective Judgment.Michael Kurak - 2016 - Kant Studies Online (1):12-41.
Kant's Theory of Judgment, and Judgments of Taste: On Henry Allison's "Kant's Theory of Taste".Béatrice Longuenesse - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):143 – 163.
Lingering: Pleasure, Desire, and Life in Kant's Critique of Judgment.Robert Lehman - 2018 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 32 (2):217-242.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-10-15

Total views
44 ( #247,967 of 2,462,295 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #20,157 of 2,462,295 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes