Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (14):1454-1464 (2019)

Authors
Derek Sankey
University of Sydney
Chris Duncan
Staffordshire University
Abstract
Over the past two decades, two heavily funded initiatives of the Federal government of Australia have been founded on two very different and seemingly conflicting visions of education. The first, the Australian Values Education Program enshrines what may be called an ‘embedded values’ vision of education; the second, the National Assessments Program-Literacy and Numeracy enshrines a ‘performative’ vision. The purpose of this article is to unpack these two seemingly conflicting visions and to argue instead for their possible consilience, bringing together apparently incompatible phenomena to coalesce into a single, more expansive vision of schooling. Against the historical context that gave rise to AVEP and NAPLAN in Australia, the article argues that the visions of education rendered in these abrupt policy shifts are vestiges of a history of dichotomous and dualistic thinking in western educational philosophy. Underpinning this dualism is a fundamental schism between cognition and emotion and a Cartesian separation of mind from body that can no longer be sustained. Our increased understanding of the neural substrates of cognition, the ‘intertwined’ nature of cognition and emotion, combined with a philosophy of mind that does not dissociate propositional knowledge from the disposition of the learner, points to an alternative vision of education. A vision that is thoroughly values embedded, concerned with the educational wellbeing of each child, while also giving value to and prioritising educational performance and achievement, and the intellectual liberation these can offer each and every child.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1080/00131857.2018.1557044
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,060
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Tacit Dimension. --.Michael Polanyi & Amartya Sen - 1966 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
Ethics and Education.R. S. Peters - 1966 - London: Allen & Unwin.
Knowing How.Jason Stanley & Timothy Willlamson - 2001 - Journal of Philosophy 98 (8):411-444.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Confirmation for a Modest Realism.Laura J. Snyder - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):839-849.
Whewell's Consilience of Inductions--An Evaluation.Menachem Fisch - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (2):239-255.
Conflicting Visions in American Art Museums.VeraL Zolberg - 1981 - Theory and Society 10 (1):103-125.
Uniting the Sciences and Arts.Anthony Lock - 2014 - Philosophy and Literature 38 (1):178-194.
Call for Papers: Peirce and Education: The Conflicting Processes of Learning and Discovery.[author unknown] - 2004 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 22 (6):415-415.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-01-10

Total views
21 ( #488,656 of 2,403,706 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #550,229 of 2,403,706 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes