Rhizomata 8 (2):289-311 (2021)

Authors
Matthew Duncombe
Nottingham University
Abstract
If a deductive argument is valid, then the conclusion is not novel. If the conclusion of an argument is not novel, the argument is not useful. So, if a deductive argument is valid, it is not useful. This conclusion,, is unacceptable. Since the argument is valid, we must reject at least one premise. So, should we reject or? This puzzle is usually known as the ‘scandal of deduction’. Analytic philosophers have tried to reject but have assumed premise. I argue here that Aristotle would deny. Aristotle thinks that at least some deductive arguments are useful, even though they present no new conclusions. Thus, Aristotle’s view contrasts with analytic philosophers of logic, who assume that all useful deductive arguments present novel conclusions. I don’t claim that Aristotle ‘solves’ the problem: it was never posed in Aristotle’s time. Rather, I suggest that Aristotle does not face the problem because he assumes deductions can be useful, without presenting novel conclusions. Aristotle’s view of deduction tames the scandal.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1515/rhiz-2020-0013
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,836
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Logical Basis of Metaphysics.Michael DUMMETT - 1991 - Harvard University Press.
Semantic Information.Yehoshua Bar-Hillel & Rudolf Carnap - 1953 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4 (14):147-157.

View all 31 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Mathematical Model of Aristotle’s Syllogistic.John Corcoran - 1973 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 55 (2):191-219.
Completeness of an Ancient Logic.John Corcoran - 1972 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (4):696-702.
Aristotle's Many-Sorted Logic.J. Corcoran - 2008 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (1):155-156.
The Practical Syllogism in Aristotle: A New Interpretation.Anthony W. Price - 2008 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 11:151-162.
The Practical Syllogism in Aristotle. A New Interpretation.Anthony Price - 2009 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 12.
Why Are There No Conditionals in Aristotle’s Logic?David Ebrey - 2015 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 53 (2):185-205.
Aristotle on Deduction and Inferential Necessity.Jean-Louis Hudry - 2013 - Review of Metaphysics 67 (1):29-54.
Aristotle on Circular Proof.Marko Malink - 2013 - Phronesis 58 (3):215-248.
Aristotle’s Defensible Defence of Slavery.Peter Simpson - 2006 - Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek Political Thought 23 (1):95-115.
The Founding of Logic.John Corcoran - 1994 - Ancient Philosophy 14 (S1):9-24.
Aristotle'S Natural Deduction Reconsidered.John M. Martin - 1997 - History and Philosophy of Logic 18 (1):1-15.
Aristotle’s Theory of Deduction and Paraconsistency.Evandro Luís Gomes & Itala M. Loffredo D'Ottaviano - 2010 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 14 (1):71-97.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-04-09

Total views
1 ( #1,471,392 of 2,426,008 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #544,761 of 2,426,008 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes