Philosophy of Science 71 (5):892-900 (2004)
This paper compares human diversity with biological diversity generally. Drawing on the pluralistic perspective on biological species defended in earlier work (2002, chs. 3 and 4), I argue that there are useful parallels to be drawn between human and animal kinds, as there are between their respective sources in cultural evolution and evolution generally. This view is developed in opposition to the insistence by sociobiologists and their successors on minimizing the significance of culture. The paper concludes with a discussion of the relation between cultural difference and individual difference, and the relation of the latter to conceptions of human freedom.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Millikan's Historical Kinds.Mohan Matthen - 2013 - In Dan Ryder, Justine Kingsbury & Kenneth Williford (eds.), Millikan and Her Critics. Wiley. pp. 135-154.
Biological Essentialism and the Tidal Change of Natural Kinds.John S. Wilkins - 2013 - Science and Education 22 (2):221-240.
Sexes, Species, and Genomes: Why Males and Females Are Not Like Humans and Chimpanzees.Sarah S. Richardson - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (5):823-841.
Why Hacking is Wrong About Human Kinds.Rachel Cooper - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (1):73-85.
On the Functional Origins of Essentialism.H. Clark Barrett - 2001 - [Journal (Paginated)] (in Press) 2 (1):1-30.
Bridging the Gap Between Human Kinds and Biological Kinds.Marc Ereshefsky - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):912-921.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads63 ( #83,693 of 2,172,657 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,028 of 2,172,657 )
How can I increase my downloads?