- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Scientific Pluralism and the Plurality of the Sciences: Comments on David Hull’s S cience as a Process
Philosophical Studies 60 (1-2):61 - 76 (1990)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
David Hull's evolutionary model for the progress and process of science.David Oldroyd - 1990 - Biology and Philosophy 5 (4):473-487.
Scientific Pluralism in Practice: Responses to Anomaly in the Sciences.Sophie Juliane Veigl - 2022 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 14 (14).
Selection and science: Critical notice of David Hull's science as a process. [REVIEW]Alex Rosenberg - 1992 - Biology and Philosophy 7 (2):217-228.
Biological explanations, realism, ontology, and categories.Matthew J. Barker - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4):617-622.
From Hacking's Plurality of Styles of Scientific Reasoning to “Foliated” Pluralism: A Philosophically Robust Form of Ontologico-Methodological Pluralism.Stéphanie Ruphy - 2011 - Philosophy of Science 78 (5):1212-1222.
Towards Democratic Models of Science: Exploring the Case of Scientific Pluralism.Jeroen Van Bouwel - 2015 - Perspectives on Science 23 (2):149-172.
Is science an evolutionay process? Evidence from miscitation of the scientific literature.Kim J. Vicente - 2000 - Perspectives on Science 8 (1):53-69.
The Plurality of Explanatory Games.C. Mantzavinos - 2015 - In Gianluca Manzo (ed.), Theories and Social Mechanisms. Oxford: The Bardwell Press. pp. 325-335.
Scientific pluralism reconsidered: a new approach to the (dis)unity of science.Stephanie Ruphy - 2016 - Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Costs and Benefits of Diverse Plurality in Economics.Teemu Lari & Uskali Mäki - 2024 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 54 (5):412-441.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
104 (#175,261)
6 months
19 (#191,550)
2009-01-28
Downloads
104 (#175,261)
6 months
19 (#191,550)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Toward Philosophy of Science’s Social Engagement.Angela Potochnik & Francis Cartieri - 2013 - Erkenntnis 79 (Suppl 5):901-916.
Studying the study of science scientifically.David L. Hull - 1998 - Perspectives on Science 6 (3):209-231.
Conceptual Evolution: a Response.David L. Hull - 1990 - PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990 (2):255-264.
References found in this work
A Radical Solution to the Species Problem.Michael T. Ghiselin - 1974 - Systematic Zoology 23 (4):536–544.
The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.S. J. Gould & R. C. Lewontin - 1994 - In Elliott Sober (ed.), Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. The Mit Press. Bradford Books. pp. 73-90.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6b65f85844-fbfkv uwo