A critique of the technological interpretation of historical materialism

Philosophy of the Social Sciences 22 (2):157-186 (1992)

David A. Duquette
St. Norbert College
This essay examines and criticizes G. A. Cohen's interpretation of Marx's materialistic conception of history as presented in Cohen's book Karl Marx's Theory of History. In particular, the author attacks Cohen's Primacy Thesis, the claim that (for Marx) human technology is the primary explanatory factor for economic and social change and for historical development generally. The focus of the attack is Cohen's way of distinguishing between the material and social characteristics, or the content and form, of a system of production. The argument is that Cohen's distinctions are defective and therefore fail to provide adequate support for the Primacy Thesis and that, moreover, the position that Cohen defends is not Marx's.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/004839319202200201
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,694
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Marx and Cohen on Exploitation and the Labor Theory of Value.Nancy Holmstrom - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):287 – 307.
Two Qualms About Functionalist Marxism.Joel Dickman - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (4):631-643.
G.A. Cohen's Karl Marx's Theory of History: A Defence.Simon Kennedy - 2005 - Historical Materialism 13 (4):331-344.
Historical Materialism and Supervenience.Colin Farrelly - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (4):420-446.
Functional Explanation, Consequence Explanation, and Marxism.G. A. Cohen - 1982 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):27 – 56.
Is It Immaterial That There's a 'Material' in 'Historical Materialism'?Charles W. Mills - 1989 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 32 (3):323 – 342.


Added to PP index

Total views
53 ( #155,566 of 2,264,520 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #612,816 of 2,264,520 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature