Abstract
Both "dialectical contradiction" and "logical contradiction" use the word "contradiction." This is misleading; it may easily lead people to believe that the word "contradiction" has only one meaning and thus confuse dialectical contradiction with logical contradiction. As a matter of fact, in dialectics and logic "contradiction" implies different things. "Contradiction" as used in dialectics refers to the two contradictory aspects in a thing. In contrast, "contradiction" as described in formal logic means the self-contradictoriness in thinking. For example, contradictions between the productive forces and the relations of production, between one's merits and weaknesses, and between getting rid of the stale and taking in the fresh are all dialectical contradictions. "At once a man and a not-man," "at once existent and non-existent," "at once meritorious and non-meritorious," and so forth are all logical contradictions. The law of contradiction of formal logic excludes only the self-contradictoriness in thinking and has nothing to do with dialectical contradiction. The law of contradiction says that there can be no"A and not-A." That is to say, "A and not-A" is the logic contradiction that the law of contradiction should rule out. If we admit that dialectical contradiction is not logical contradiction, we then cannot describe dialectical contradiction as "A and not-A."
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2753/CSP1097-146713043
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,999
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Dialectical Contradiction is Not "A and Not-A". Rujdui - 1982 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 13 (4):3-8.
Dialectical Contradictions and Classical Formal Logic.Inoue Kazumi - 2014 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 28 (2):113-132.
On Contradiction.François George - 1978 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1978 (36):55-80.
A Brief Discussion of Logical Contradiction.Zhu Zhikai - 1982 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 13 (4):16-20.
The Principal Contradiction and the Principal Aspect of a Contradiction.[author unknown] - 1977 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 9 (1):61-88.
On "Can the Law of Contradiction Be Contravened?".Sung Wen-Kan - 1970 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 1 (2):213-222.
The Universality and Particularity of Contradiction.[author unknown] - 1977 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 9 (1):36-60.
The Law of Non-Contradiction as a Metaphysical Principle.Tuomas Tahko - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Logic 7:32-47.
Contradiction or Non-Contradiction? Hegel's Dialectic Between Brandom and Priest.Michela Bordignon - 2012 - Verifiche: Rivista Trimestrale di Scienze Umane 41 (1-3).
Wittgenstein's Attitude Toward Contradiction.Seung-Chong Lee - 1992 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-02

Total views
16 ( #617,677 of 2,410,288 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #188,523 of 2,410,288 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes