Austin On Whether Every Proposition Has A Contradictory

Analysis 27 (April):167-170 (1967)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Austin rejects the contention that every proposition has a contradictory. This paper finds problems with the case Austin makes for rejecting the contention in question.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,703

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

To Austin or not to Austin, that's the disjunction.Robert Schwartz - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):255-263.
Reading Austin Rhetorically.Andrew Munro - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (1):22-43.
Philosophical papers.John Langshaw Austin - 1962 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by J. O. Urmson & G. J. Warnock.
Austin and perception.Charles Sayward - 2001 - Acta Analytica 16 (27):169-193.
The province of jurisprudence determined and The uses of the study of jurisprudence.John Austin - 1954 - London,: Weidenfeld & Nicolson. Edited by John Austin.
Tales of the Unknown: Austin and the Argument from Ignorance.Mark Kaplan - 2011 - In Martin Gustafson & Richard Sørli (eds.), The Philosophy of J.L. Austin. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-04

Downloads
87 (#176,385)

6 months
3 (#434,103)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Charles Sayward
University of Nebraska, Lincoln

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references