Analysis 27 (April):167-170 (1967)
AbstractAustin rejects the contention that every proposition has a contradictory. This paper finds problems with the case Austin makes for rejecting the contention in question.
Similar books and articles
Austin on Whether Every Proposition Has a Contradictory.Charles Sayward & Michael Durrant - 1967 - Analysis 27 (5):167 - 170.
To Austin or Not to Austin, That's the Disjunction.Robert Schwartz - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 120 (1-3):255-263.
What's the Meaning of "This"?: A Puzzle About Demonstrative Belief.David F. Austin - 1985 - Cornell University Press.
The Austinian Theory of Law; Being an Edition of Lectures I, V, and Vi of Austin's Jurisprudence, and of Austin's Essay on the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence, with Critical Notes and Excursus.John Austin - 1906 - F.B. Rothman.
Doing Austin Justice: The Reception of John Austin's Philosophy of Law in Nineteenth Century England.Wilfrid E. Rumble - 2004 - Continuum.
The Province of Jurisprudence Determined and the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence.John Austin - 1954 - London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Tales of the Unknown: Austin and the Argument From Ignorance.Mark Kaplan - 2011 - In Martin Gustafson & Richard Sørli (eds.), The Philosophy of J.L. Austin. Oxford University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads