Authors
Abstract
McGrew & McGrew make a solid statistical case for the historicity of the resurrection. This article fills two lacunae in the argument given there, and repairs a conceptual error (making the first lacuna irrelevant in the process).
Keywords Prior probability  Tail probability  Countertestimony
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Probability of the Resurrection of Jesus.Richard Swinburne - 2013 - Philosophia Christi 15 (2):239-252.
The Revision Theory of Resurrection.Eric Steinhart - 2008 - Religious Studies 44 (1):63-81.
The Resurrection of Jesus in Art.Ulrich Luz - 2011 - Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 65 (1):44-55.
The Resurrection of Jesus and Rational Apologetics.Dale C. Allison - 2008 - Philosophia Christi 10 (2):315-338.
The Resurrection Revisited.G. O'collins - 1998 - Gregorianum 79 (1):169-172.
David Hume and the Probability of Miracles.George I. Mavrodes - 1998 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43 (3):167-182.
Julian and Porphyry on the Resurrection of Jesus in the Gospels.John Granger Cook - 2016 - International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 10 (2):193-207.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-10-09

Total views
126 ( #91,404 of 2,498,301 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #25,665 of 2,498,301 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes