The asymmetry in Tobia's modal arguments

Abstract

In Tobia (2016), Kevin P. Tobia tests for bias using two ontological arguments claimed to be symmetrical and of equal strength. We show they are neither.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Gauging personal identity.Kevin Tobia - 2016 - Forum for European Philosophy Blog.
Modal theistic arguments.Graham Oppy - 1993 - Sophia 32 (2):17-24.
Does religious belief impact philosophical analysis?Kevin P. Tobia - 2016 - Religion, Brain and Behavior 6 (1):56-66.
The trade-off between symmetry and asymmetry.Michael C. Corballis - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):594-595.
The Language of War.Kevin P. Tobia - 2016 - The Monist 99 (1):40-54.
Wonder and Value.Kevin Patrick Tobia - 2015 - Res Philosophica 92 (4):959-984.
Modified Gaunilo-Type Objections Against Modal Ontological Arguments.Chlastawa Daniel - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 4 (2):113--126.
Sweet FA: The trouble with fluctuating asymmetry.Robert Montgomerie - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):616-617.
Asymmetry arguments.Berislav Marušić - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (4):1081-1102.
Karl Jaspers: esiti di una sistematica aperta non oggettiva.Tobia Ave - 2010 - Scandicci, Firenze: Firenze Atheneum.
Editorial.Ana María González de Tobia - 2013 - Synthesis 20:13-15.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-10-08

Downloads
351 (#49,961)

6 months
135 (#19,820)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations