Descartes' Theistic Metaphysics in its Scholastic Context

Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania (1993)

Authors
Blake Dutton
Loyola University, Chicago
Abstract
Descartes' relation to the scholastic tradition is poorly understood. In the dissertation I begin to redress this deficiency by studying his theism in relation to its scholastic predecessors. This is a natural starting point since it is in the theistic doctrine that we not only see Descartes' profound indebtedness to scholasticism, but find the foundations of his radically anti-Aristotelian scientific program as well. I begin with an analysis of Descartes' views on the relation of philosophy, theology and science, particularly in light of his transformation of Aquinas' doctrine and his evaluation of Galileo's scientific work. Although Descartes shared with Galileo a concern to create a space in which to do science without theological hindrance, he did this in a way which allowed him to provide his science with deep metaphysical and theistic foundations. From here I turn to an examination of the epistemological and metaphysical underpinnings of Cartesian natural theology in light of the Thomistic, Scotistic and Suarezian traditions, first by looking at Descartes' reaction to Aquinas' criticisms of the ontological argument, then by reconstructing his views on necessary existence and the divine perfections, and finally by examining his account of the essence/existence relation. I conclude the dissertation by expanding earlier discussions concerning the foundational role of the doctrine of God in Cartesian physics and examine some problems which arise when Descartes' claim to derive the laws of motion from the idea of God is seen in light of his doctrines of the divine indifference and the creation of the eternal truths. In all of this I show how the modifications which Descartes made to the scholastic doctrines allowed him to adapt the tradition of classical theism to the demands of his mechanistic science
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,811
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Indifference, Necessity, and Descartes's Derivation of the Laws of Motion.Blake D. Dutton - 1996 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (2):193-212.
Descartes' Philosophy of Nature.Abubaker Ibrahim Tallue - 1984 - Dissertation, Tulane University
The Radical Cartesianism of Robert Desgabets and the Scholastic Heritage.Han Thomas Adriaenssen - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (1):46-68.
Descartes on Time and Duration.Geoffrey Gorham - 2007 - Early Science and Medicine 12 (1):28-54.
Descartes on Forms and Mechanisms (Review).Steven Nadler - 2010 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (3):399-400.
Cartesian Causation: Continuous, Instantaneous, Overdetermined.Geoffrey Gorham - 2004 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (4):389-423.
Descartes: A Reconciliation of Two Doctrines.Stephen Ira Wagner - 1982 - Dissertation, New York University
Cartesian Truth.Thomas C. Vinci - 1997 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-06

Total views
1 ( #1,517,031 of 2,463,153 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,391 of 2,463,153 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes