Abstract
In the Critique of Judgment, Kant presents what is possibly the most powerful aesthetic theory ever devised. It is not the clearest, and even when it comes clear, it is only after much toil. But its contradictions and complexities — apparent or real — reflect and disclose to great depth the very complexities and paradoxes that infect our artistic and aesthetic lives. Later aestheticians have with greater sophistication directed attention to the social and historical aspects of institutionalised fine arts, but in terms of providing philosophic provocations to take us deep into the centres of aesthetic experience, the Critique of Judgment is unmatched — the most important work of aesthetic theory since Aristotle’s Poetics. In the minds of many of us, its supremacy in aesthetics remains unchallenged today
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,241
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Disconnecting Reality.Brit Strandhagen - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 12:31-35.
Critical Aesthetic Realism.Jennifer A. McMahon - 2011 - Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (2):49-69.
Beauty.Nick Zangwill - 2003 - In Jerrold Levinson (ed.), Oxford Companion to Aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
Kant and the Aesthetics of Nature.Alexander Rueger - 2007 - British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (2):138-155.
Kant's Aesthetic Revolution.Albert Hofstadter - 1975 - Journal of Religious Ethics 3 (2):171 - 191.
Gerard and Kant: Influence and Opposition.Paul Guyer - 2011 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (1):59-93.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
41 ( #228,752 of 2,325,377 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #298,641 of 2,325,377 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes