Studia Neoaristotelica 1 (1/2):33-69 (2004)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
The article deals with various modal versions of the ontological argument from N. Malcolm’s to P. Tichý’s interpretation of Anselm’s second proof. Three key presuppositions of the modal proof are pin-pointed and examined. The principal problem with the proof seems to be the notion of necessary existence attributed to God. More precisely, the question is whether this is not too strong an attribute, for then there would not be a situation, i.e. a possible world, consistently thinkable which precludes the existence of God. However, this seems to be wrong.
|
Keywords | Catholic Tradition History of Philosophy Philosophy and Religion |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 1214-8407 |
DOI | studneoar200411/24 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Ad „K modálnímu ontologickému důkazu“: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism.David Peroutka Ocd - 2005 - Studia Neoaristotelica 2 (2):239-240.
Ad „K modálnímu ontologickému důkazu“.David Peroutka Ocd - 2005 - Studia Neoaristotelica 2 (2):239-240.
The Importance of Cartesian Triangles: A New Look at Descartes's Ontological Argument.M. V. Dougherty - 2002 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (1):35 – 62.
Does Anselm Beg the Question?Keith Burgess-Jackson - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (1):5-18.
Burdens of Proof: Why Modal Ontological Arguments Aren’T Convincing.James Hardy - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:321-330.
The Lost Legacy of Anselm's Argument: Re-Thinking the Purpose of Proofs for the Existence of God.Lydia Schumacher - 2011 - Modern Theology 27 (1):87-101.
Anselm’s Ontological Argument and Aristotle’s Elegktikōs Apodeixai.Michael Oliver Wiitala - 2012 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 86:129-140.
Descartes's Ontological Proof of God's Existence.Cecilia Wee - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (1):23-40.
Descartes's Ontological Proof of God's Existence.Cecilia Wee - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (1):23 - 40.
Descriptions of God: A Critique of Anselm’s Ontological Argument.John Woodlee - 2008 - Stance 1:8-14.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-01-09
Total views
39 ( #257,489 of 2,401,553 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #551,447 of 2,401,553 )
2011-01-09
Total views
39 ( #257,489 of 2,401,553 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #551,447 of 2,401,553 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads