Studia Neoaristotelica 1 (1/2):33-69 (2004)

Authors
Petr Dvorak
Palacky University
Abstract
The article deals with various modal versions of the ontological argument from N. Malcolm’s to P. Tichý’s interpretation of Anselm’s second proof. Three key presuppositions of the modal proof are pin-pointed and examined. The principal problem with the proof seems to be the notion of necessary existence attributed to God. More precisely, the question is whether this is not too strong an attribute, for then there would not be a situation, i.e. a possible world, consistently thinkable which precludes the existence of God. However, this seems to be wrong.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  History of Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1214-8407
DOI studneoar200411/24
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,825
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

K modálnímu ontologickému důkazu.Petr Dvořák - 2004 - Studia Neoaristotelica 1 (1/2):33-69.
Ad „K modálnímu ontologickému důkazu“.David Peroutka Ocd - 2005 - Studia Neoaristotelica 2 (2):239-240.
The Importance of Cartesian Triangles: A New Look at Descartes's Ontological Argument.M. V. Dougherty - 2002 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 10 (1):35 – 62.
Does Anselm Beg the Question?Keith Burgess-Jackson - 2014 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 76 (1):5-18.
Burdens of Proof: Why Modal Ontological Arguments Aren’T Convincing.James Hardy - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:321-330.
Anselm’s Ontological Argument and Aristotle’s Elegktikōs Apodeixai.Michael Oliver Wiitala - 2012 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 86:129-140.
Descartes's Ontological Proof of God's Existence.Cecilia Wee - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (1):23-40.
Descartes's Ontological Proof of God's Existence.Cecilia Wee - 2012 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (1):23 - 40.
Burdens of Proof.James Hardy - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:321-330.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
39 ( #257,489 of 2,401,553 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #551,447 of 2,401,553 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes