A Group-Based Approach to Reparations

Abstract

This paper attempts to offer a group-based approach to reparations for slavery. I argue that by appealing to a group-based approach to reparations, one can avoid some of the significant problems associated with attempting to justify reparations on an individual level. I argue that, properly formulated, a group-based approach can avoid problems of identification, the non-identity problem, as well as misgivings about appealing to the notion that groups can have a moral standing that is not merely the aggregation of the moral standing of the individual group members. In order to show that a group-based approach is a viable solution to these issues, I appeal to Larry May’s account of groups.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Group-based reasons for action.Christopher Woodard - 2003 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (2):215-229.
Moral Taint.Loren Cannon - 2011 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 18 (1):19-30.
‘What if value and rights lie foundationally in groups?’ The Maori Case.Andrew Sharp - 1999 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 2 (2):1-28.
Group adaptation, formal darwinism and contextual analysis.Samir Okasha & Cedric Paternotte - 2012 - Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25 (6):1127–1139.
Group beliefs.Raimo Tuomela - 1992 - Synthese 91 (3):285-318.
Reparations: interdisciplinary inquiries.Jon Miller & Rahul Kumar (eds.) - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Case Against Reparations.Stephen Kershnar - 2001 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 8 (1):41-46.
A two-tiered reparations theory: A reply to Wenar.Thom Brooks - 2008 - Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (4):666-669.
Reconciliation and reparations.Howard Mcgary - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (4):546-562.
Is there such a thing as “group selection” in the contextual analysis framework?Ciprian Jeler - 2015 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 36 (4):484-502.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-05-01

Downloads
20 (#723,940)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elizabeth Dwyer
Carleton University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Are there any Cultural Rights?Chandran Kukathas - 1992 - Political Theory 20 (1):105-139.
A Lockean argument for Black reparations.Bernard R. Boxill - 2003 - The Journal of Ethics 7 (1):63-91.
Collective responsibility.Jan Narveson - 2002 - The Journal of Ethics 6 (2):179-198.
Collective responsibility.Hannah Arendt - 1987 - In James William Bernauer (ed.), Amor Mundi: Explorations in the Faith and Thought of Hannah Arendt. Distributors for the U.S. And Canada Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Who? Whom? Reparations and the problem of agency.Chandran Kukathas - 2006 - Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (3):330–341.

View all 9 references / Add more references