Radical Constructivism Has an Answer – But This Answer Is not an Easy One

Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):22-30 (2010)
Context: In spite of its advantages and its ability to make valid responses to objections, radical constructivism is not mainstream. Problem: Extolling the virtues of radical constructivism and responding logically to the objections does not work. We know this from the evidence of many attempts. Our theoretical stance, radical constructivism, also suggests this approach is not likely to have much influence on realists. We cannot transmit understanding in the signals with which we attempt to communicate. How can we in radical constructivism enable those outside of RC to understand our explanation of human knowing? Method: Examine our understanding of radical constructivism itself, because it is an explanation of how, why and under what circumstances people change their understandings of their experiential worlds. Results: We must find ways to direct the attention of others to situations that they cannot explain with their existing understanding of the world. Then we must create conditions conducive to their revising and testing new understandings for fit with the evidence of their experience. Implications: Since radical constructivism is a theory of human knowing, it tells us how humans develop knowledge, hence it is an answer to the questions central to this special issue. This answer is not one to be used to win in debates with realists. Radical constructivism gives us an answer to the problem of engaging realists in understanding our position, but strategies consistent with radical constructivism are not easily carried out. Developing and executing such strategies is the work at hand
Keywords history of science  paradigm change  physics education research  realism  folk theory of teaching  cognitive equilibration
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,651
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Radical Constructivism in Communication Science.A. Scholl - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):51-57.
Onwards and Upwards, Radical Constructivism. A Guest Commentary.P. Cariani - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):127-132.
Radical Constructivism and Its Failings: Anti-Realism and Individualism.Mark Olssen - 1996 - British Journal of Educational Studies 44 (3):275-295.
Radical Constructivism: Epistemology, Education and Dynamite.P. Slezak - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):102-111.
Radikaler Konstruktivismus Und Konstruktionismus.Wendel Hans Jürgen - 1992 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 23 (2):323 - 352.
Objections to Radical Constructivism.A. Quale - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):12-18.
Against Constructivism.M. A. Boden - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):84-89.
Why People Dislike Radical Constructivism.Ernst von Glasersfeld - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):19-21.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

15 ( #314,363 of 2,169,401 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #345,461 of 2,169,401 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums