Liberalism after the fall: Schmitt, Rawls and the problem of justification

Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (3):9-37 (1996)
Carl Schmitt's critique of liberalism portrays liberalism as a supple political ideology, one which moves constantly between the horns of several connected dilemmas. In particular, liberalism cannot decide whether it is based on substantive political values or is neutral or substanceless. John Rawls's 'political liberalism' is argued to exemplify-and to fall prey to-Schmitt's critique. Rawls tries to find a shallow justification for liberalism, one which claims no truth for itself and is thus neutral between many different ideologies. But his justification, as he is forced to admit, presupposes the substantive commitments he wants to avoid. Hence, liberalism has to move beyond Rawls and accept its place within democracy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/019145379602200302
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,781
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
132 ( #37,824 of 2,199,426 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,438 of 2,199,426 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature