Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (3):9-37 (1996)

David Dyzenhaus
University of Toronto, St. George
Carl Schmitt's critique of liberalism portrays liberalism as a supple political ideology, one which moves constantly between the horns of several connected dilemmas. In particular, liberalism cannot decide whether it is based on substantive political values or is neutral or substanceless. John Rawls's 'political liberalism' is argued to exemplify-and to fall prey to-Schmitt's critique. Rawls tries to find a shallow justification for liberalism, one which claims no truth for itself and is thus neutral between many different ideologies. But his justification, as he is forced to admit, presupposes the substantive commitments he wants to avoid. Hence, liberalism has to move beyond Rawls and accept its place within democracy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/019145379602200302
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,141
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Law of Peoples: With the 'Idea of Public Reason Revisited'.Kok-Chor Tan - 2001 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):113-132.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
172 ( #54,779 of 2,404,067 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #550,679 of 2,404,067 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes