Animal Studies Journal 9 (1):170-200 (2020)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
In a recent article, Corey Wrenn argues that in order to adequately address injustices done to
animals, we ought to think systemically. Her argument stems from a critique of the individualist
approach I employ to resolve a moral dilemma faced by animal sanctuaries, who sometimes must
harm some animals to help others. But must systemic critiques of injustice be at odds with
individualist approaches? In this paper, I respond to Wrenn by showing how individualist
approaches that take seriously the notion of group responsibility can be deployed to solve
complicated dilemmas that are products of injustice. Contra Wrenn, I argue that to adequately
address injustice, acting individually, often within groups, is significantly more important than
thinking systemically.
|
| Keywords | animal ethics animals in captivity moral dilemmas animal rights hunting animal sanctuaries individualism |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Options |
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases.Alastair Norcross - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):229–245.
Strict Vegetarianism is Immoral.Donald W. Bruckner - 2015 - In Ben Bramble & Fischer Bob (eds.), The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat. Oxford University Press. pp. 30-47.
Bugging the Strict Vegan.Bob Fischer - 2016 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (2):255-263.
View all 14 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Animals & Ethics 101: Thinking Critically About Animal Rights.Nathan Nobis - 2016 - Open Philosophy Press.
The Moderate Veiw on Animal Ethics.Charles K. Fink - 1991 - Between the Species: A Journal of Ethics 7 (4):194-200.
Raising the Bar in the Justification of Animal Research.Elisa Galgut - 2015 - Journal of Animal Ethics 5 (1):5-19,.
Compassion and Animals: How We Ought to Treat Animals in a World Without Justice.C. E. Abbate - 2018 - In Justin Caouette & Carolyn Price (eds.), The Moral Psychology of Compassion.
Animal Rights and the Duty to Harm: When to Be a Harm Causing Deontologist.C. E. Abbate - 2020 - Journal for Ethics and Moral Philosophy 3 (1):5-26.
How to Help When It Hurts: The Problem of Assisting Victims of Injustice.Cheryl Abbate - 2016 - Journal of Social Philosophy 47 (2):142-170.
Between Individualistic Animal Ethics and Holistic Environmental Ethics Blurring the Boundaries.Marcel Verweij & Bernice Bovenkerk - 2016 - In Bernice Bovenkerk & Jozef Keulartz (eds.), Animal Ethics in the Age of Humans: Blurring Boundaries in Human-Animal Relationships. Springer.
Animal Rights: A Non‐Consequentialist Approach.Uriah Kriegel - 2013 - In K. Petrus & M. Wild (eds.), Animal Minds and Animal Ethics. Transcript.
Animal Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Responsiveness.Kelly Oliver - 2010 - Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):267-280.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-04-28
Total views
163 ( #71,980 of 2,507,861 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #29,271 of 2,507,861 )
2020-04-28
Total views
163 ( #71,980 of 2,507,861 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #29,271 of 2,507,861 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads




