Social Epistemology 35 (1):67-84 (2021)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
A widely accepted view in epistemology is that we do not have direct control over our beliefs. And we surely do not have as much control over our beliefs as we have over simple actions. For instance, you can, if offered $500, immediately throw your steak in the trash, but a meat-eater cannot, at will, start believing that eating animals is wrong to secure a $500 reward. Yet, even though we have more control over our behavior than we have over our beliefs, some of our behavior, especially moral behavior, is heavily influenced by our beliefs. Meat-eating is one example. So, if we do not have direct control over our beliefs and our beliefs influence our moral behavior, it’s no wonder meat-eaters aren’t immediately boycotting Burger King and lining up for the Beyond Burger after hearing about the mistreatment of farmed animals. So, how, or can we, inspire meat-eaters to change their beliefs regarding the moral significance of meat-eating and, consequently, their animal-eating behavior? I propose an answer to this difficult question.
|
| Keywords | Meat eating Vegetarianism Animal ethics epistemology Doxastic voluntarism |
| Categories |
No categories specified (categorize this paper) |
| Reprint years | 2020, 2021 |
| DOI | 10.1080/02691728.2020.1771794 |
| Options |
|
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases.Alastair Norcross - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):229–245.
Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility.James Montmarquet - 1992 - American Philosophical Quarterly 29 (4):331-341.
View all 12 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Harnessing Moral Psychology to Reduce Meat Consumption.Joshua May & Victor Kumar - forthcoming - Journal of the American Philosophical Association.
Similar books and articles
Meat Eating and Moral Responsibility: Exploring the Moral Distinctions Between Meat Eaters and Puppy Torturers.C. E. Abbate - 2020 - Utilitas 32 (4):398-415.
In Defense of Eating Vegan.Stijn Bruers - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (4):705-717.
‘Animals Do It Too!’: The Franklin Defence of Meat-Eating.Elizabeth Telfer - 2004 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (1):51-67.
The Moral Complexities of Eating Meat.Ben Bramble & Bob Fischer (eds.) - 2015 - Oxford University Press.
On Eating Animals: Michael B. Gill.Michael B. Gill - 2013 - Social Philosophy and Policy 30 (1-2):201-207.
Vegetarian Meat: Could Technology Save Animals and Satisfy Meat Eaters?Patrick D. Hopkins & Austin Dacey - 2008 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (6):579-596.
Vegetarianism, Traditional Morality, and Moral Conservatism.David Detmer - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (Supplement):39-48.
Minimalizacja Cierpienia Zwierząt a Wegetarianizm.Krzysztof Saja - 2013 - Analiza I Egzystencja 22:67-83.
In Defense of Eating Meat.Timothy Hsiao - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (2):277-291.
Eating Animals and the Moral Value of Non-Human Suffering.Salim Hirèche & Sandra Villata - 2013 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 88 (1):247-256.
Women, Power, and Meat: Comparing the Sexual Contract and the Sexual Politics of Meat.Erin McKenna - 1996 - Journal of Social Philosophy 27 (1):47-64.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-06-02
Total views
49 ( #231,434 of 2,507,861 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #138,934 of 2,507,861 )
2020-06-02
Total views
49 ( #231,434 of 2,507,861 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #138,934 of 2,507,861 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads




