American Journal of Physics 73:976–979 (2005)
Recently a suggestion has been made that standard textbook representations of hypersurfaces of simultaneity for the travelling twin in the twin 'paradox' are incorrect. This suggestion is false: the standard textbooks are in agreement with a proper understanding of the relativity of simultaneity.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Does Twin Earth Rest on a Mistake?Katalin Farkas - 2003 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (8):155-169.
A New Look at Simultaneity.Kent A. Peacock - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:542 - 552.
A Geometrical Characterization of the Twin Paradox and its Variants.Gergely Székely - 2010 - Studia Logica 95 (1/2):161 - 182.
Moral Realism and Twin Earth.Stephen Laurence, Eric Margolis & Angus Dawson - 1999 - Facta Philosophica 1:135-165.
The Components of Content (Revised Version).David J. Chalmers - 2002 - In Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Oup Usa.
Twin Paradox and the Logical Foundation of Relativity Theory.X. Madárasz Judit, Németi István & Székely Gergely - unknown
Added to index2009-02-02
Total downloads52 ( #101,065 of 2,171,976 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,556 of 2,171,976 )
How can I increase my downloads?