A note on Dolby and Gull on radar time and the twin 'paradox'

American Journal of Physics 73 (10):976–979 (2005)
Abstract
Recently a suggestion has been made that standard textbook representations of hypersurfaces of simultaneity for the travelling twin in the twin 'paradox' are incorrect. This suggestion is false: the standard textbooks are in agreement with a proper understanding of the relativity of simultaneity.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 31,838
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Does Twin Earth Rest on a Mistake?Katalin Farkas - 2003 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (8):155-169.
Time.Bradley Dowden - 2001 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
A New Look at Simultaneity.Kent A. Peacock - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:542 - 552.
The Clock Paradox and Thermodynamics.Philip Rosen - 1959 - Philosophy of Science 26 (2):145-147.
Added to PP index
2009-02-02

Total downloads
56 ( #106,150 of 2,231,715 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #190,970 of 2,231,715 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature