The Open Future
Consider also what I shall call the asymmetry of openness: the obscure contrast we draw between the ‘open future’ and the ‘ﬁxed past.’ We tend to regard the future as a multitude of alternative possibilities, a ‘garden of forking paths’ in Borges’ phrase, whereas we regard the past as a unique, settled, immutable actuality. These descriptions scarcely wear their meaning on their sleeves, yet do seem to capture some genuine and important difference between past and future. What can it be?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Past, Present, Future, and Special Relativity.Natasa Rakic - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):257-280.
Back to the Open Future1.Elizabeth Barnes & Ross P. Cameron - 2011 - Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):1-26.
The Truth About the Past and the Future.Ned Markosian - 2013 - In Fabrice Correia & Andrea Iacona (eds.), Around the Tree: Semantic and Metaphysical Issues Concerning Branching Time and the Open Future. Springer. pp. 127-141.
The Necessity of Time Travel (On Pain of Indeterminacy).Matthew H. Slater - 2005 - The Monist 88 (3):362-369.
Probability and the Open Future View.Alexander R. Pruss - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (2):190-196.
When What Had to Happen Was Not Bound to Happen: History, Chance, Narrative, Evolution.John Beatty & Isabel Carrera - 2011 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (3):471-495.
Added to index2010-12-30
Total downloads58 ( #89,365 of 2,158,894 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #193,044 of 2,158,894 )
How can I increase my downloads?