Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (11):662-664 (2006)
There has been longstanding interest in the consistency of decisions made by research ethics committees in the UK, but most of the evidence has come from single studies submitted to multiple committees. A systematic comparison was carried out of the decisions made on 18 purposively selected applications, each of which was reviewed independently by three different RECs in a single strategic health authority. Decisions on 11 applications were consistent, but disparities were found among RECs on decisions on seven applications. An analysis of the agreement between decisions of RECs yielded an overall measure of agreement of κ = 0.286 , indicating a level of agreement that, although probably better than chance, may be described as “slight”. The small sample size limits the robustness of these findings. Further research on reasons for inconsistencies in decision making between RECs, and on the importance of such inconsistencies for a range of arguments, is needed
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Procedure Versus Process: Ethical Paradigms and the Conduct of Qualitative Research. [REVIEW]Kristian Pollock - 2012 - BMC Medical Ethics 13 (1):25-.
The Role of Research Ethics Committees in Making Decisions About Risk.Allison Ross & Nafsika Athanassoulis - 2014 - HEC Forum 26 (3):203-224.
Shortcomings of Protocols of Drug Trials in Relation to Sponsorship as Identified by Research Ethics Committees: Analysis of Comments Raised During Ethical Review.Marlies van Lent, Gerard A. Rongen & Henk J. Out - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):83.
Similar books and articles
Is 'Inconsistency' in Research Ethics Committee Decision-Making Really a Problem? An Empirical Investigation and Reflection.E. L. Angell, C. J. Jackson, R. E. Ashcroft, A. Bryman, K. Windridge & M. Dixon-Woods - 2007 - Clinical Ethics 2 (2):92-99.
Tis but a Scratch: The Human Tissue Act and the Use of Tissue for Research, Issues for Research Ethics Committees.David Hunter - unknown
Institutional Ethics Committees and Health Care Decision Making.Ronald E. Cranford & A. Edward Doudera (eds.) - 1984 - Health Administration Press.
Research Involving Adults Who Lack Capacity: How Have Research Ethics Committees Interpreted the Requirements?M. Dixon-Woods & E. L. Angell - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (6):377-381.
Ethical Decision Making: Special or No Different? [REVIEW]Dawn R. Elm & Tara J. Radin - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 107 (3):313-329.
IRB Decision-Making with Imperfect Knowledge: A Framework for Evidence-Based Research Ethics Review.Emily E. Anderson & James M. DuBois - 2012 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 40 (4):951-969.
Ethics Education and Value Prioritization Among Members of U.S. Hospital Ethics Committees.Adrian Bardon - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (4):395-406.
Do Research Ethics Committees Identify Process Errors in Applications for Ethical Approval?E. Angell & M. Dixon-Woods - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (2):130-132.
Assumptions in Decision Making Scholarship: Implications for Business Ethics Research. [REVIEW]Kirsten Martin & Bidhan Parmar - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 105 (3):289-306.
An Empirical Investigation of the Influence of Selected Personal, Organizational and Moral Intensity Factors on Ethical Decision Making.Joseph G. P. Paolillo & Scott J. Vitell - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 35 (1):65 - 74.
An Integrated Model for Ethical Decisions in Marketing Research.Naresh K. Malhotra & Gina L. Miller - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (3):263-280.
Business Ethics and the Brain.Rommel Salvador & Robert G. Folger - 2009 - Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (1):1-31.
Using Empirical Data to Inform the Ethical Evaluation of Placebo Controlled Trials.Jeremy Sugarman - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):29-35.
Spirituality and National Culture as Antecedents to Ethical Decision-Making: A Comparison Between the United States and Norway. [REVIEW]Rafik I. Beekun & James W. Westerman - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 110 (1):33-44.
The Research Ethics Review Process and Ethics Review Narratives.Maureen H. Fitzgerald, Paul A. Phillips & Elisa Yule - 2006 - Ethics and Behavior 16 (4):377 – 395.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads7 ( #519,451 of 2,158,278 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #355,837 of 2,158,278 )
How can I increase my downloads?