Acta Analytica 24 (2):139-148 (2009)

Authors
Abstract
Quine famously argued that analyticity is indefinable, since there is no good account of analyticity in terms of synonymy, and intensions are of no help since there are no intensions. Yet if there are intensions, the question still remains as to the right account of analyticity in terms of them. On the assumption that intensions must be admitted, the present paper considers two such accounts. The first analyzes analyticity in terms of concept identity, and the second analyzes analyticity in terms of the analysis relation. The first fails in light of possible counterexamples. The second is defended, both by considering test cases of intuitively clear analyticities, and by developing the account in light of possible counterexamples
Keywords Analyticity  Analysis  Intensions  Concepts  Conceptual analysis
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s12136-009-0051-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,843
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Two Dogmas of Empiricism.Willard V. O. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60 (1):20–43.
Two Dogmas of Empiricism Symposium.W. V. Quine - 1951 - Philosophical Review 60:20.
The Status of Logic.Stewart Shapiro - 2000 - In Paul Boghossian & Christopher Peacocke (eds.), New Essays on the a Priori. Oxford University Press. pp. 333--338.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

An a Posteriori Conception of Analyticity?Åsa Maria Wikforss - 2003 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 66 (1):119-139.
Representational Analyticity.Jack C. Lyons - 2005 - Mind and Language 20 (4):392–422.
On the Quinean-Analyticity of Mathematical Propositions.Gregory Lavers - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 159 (2):299-319.
Analyticity, Meaning and Paradox.Gillian Kay Russell - 2004 - Dissertation, Princeton University
Every Dogma has its Day.Richard Creath - 1991 - Erkenntnis 35 (1-3):347-389.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-06-10

Total views
103 ( #99,407 of 2,427,271 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #187,717 of 2,427,271 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes