Faith and Philosophy 10 (3):293-310 (1993)

John Earman
University of Pittsburgh
Recent attempts to cast Hume’s argument against miracles in a Bayesian form are examined. It is shown how the Bayesian apparatus does serve to clarify the structure and substance of Hume’s argument. But the apparatus does not underwrite Hume’s various claims, such as that no testimony serves to establish the credibility of a miracle; indeed, the Bayesian analysis reveals various conditions under which it would be reasonable to reject the more interesting of Hume’s claims
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0739-7046
DOI 10.5840/faithphil19931039
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,147
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Miracles.Michael Levine - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Argument From Miracles.Daniel Bonevac - 2011 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 3:16-40.
The Hume Literature, 1986-1993.William E. Morris - 1994 - Hume Studies 20 (2):299-326.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
104 ( #86,903 of 2,324,615 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #461,830 of 2,324,615 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes