How chemistry shifts horizons: Element, substance, and the essential

Foundations of Chemistry 11 (2):65-77 (2009)
In 1931 eminent chemist Fritz Paneth maintained that the modern notion of “element” is closely related to (and as “metaphysical” as) the concept of element used by the ancients (e.g., Aristotle). On that basis, the element chlorine (properly so-called) is not the elementary substance dichlorine, but rather chlorine as it is in carbon tetrachloride. The fact that pure chemicals are called “substances” in English (and closely related words are so used in other European languages) derives from philosophical compromises made by grammarians in the late Roman Empire (particularly Priscian [fl. ~520 CE]). When the main features of the constitution of isotopes became clear in the first half of the twentieth century, the formal (IUPAC) definition of a “chemical element” was changed. The features that are “essential” to being an element had previously been “transcendental” (“beyond the sphere of consciousness”) but, by the mid-twentieth century the defining characteristics of elements, as such, had come to be understood in detail. This amounts to a shift in a “horizon of invisibility” brought about by progress in chemistry and related sciences. Similarly, chemical insight is relevant to currently-open philosophical problems, such as the status of “the bundle theory” of the coherence of properties in concrete individuals.
Keywords Philosophy   Physical Chemistry   History   Chemistry/Food Science, general   Philosophy of Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10698-008-9054-5
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,567
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Truth and Truthmakers.D. M. Armstrong - 2004 - Cambridge University Press.
Qualitative Unity and the Bundle Theory.David Robb - 2005 - The Monist 88 (4):466-92.
Realism, Reduction and the “Intermediate Position”.Eric Scerri - 2000 - In Nalini Bhushan & Stuart Rosenfeld (eds.), Of Minds and Molecules: New Philosophical Perspectives on Chemistry. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 51--72.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Conceptual Changes in Chemistry: The Notion of a Chemical Element, Ca. 1900-1925.H. Kragh - 2000 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 31 (4):435-450.
On the Continuity of Reference of the Elements: A Response to Hendry.Eric Scerri - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (2):308-321.
What is a Chemical Property?Nalini Bhushan - 2007 - Synthese 155 (3):293 - 305.
Elements, Compounds, and Other Chemical Kinds.Robin Findlay Hendry - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):864-875.
Chemical Elements and the Problem of Universals.M. F. Sharlow - 2006 - Foundations of Chemistry 8 (3):225-242.
Lavoisier and Mendeleev on the Elements.Robin Findlay Hendry - 2004 - Foundations of Chemistry 7 (1):31-48.
Response to Vollmer's Review of Minds and Molecules.Eric Scerri - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (2):391-398.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
48 ( #110,741 of 2,180,794 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,817 of 2,180,794 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums