Hymen 'restoration' in cultures of oppression: how can physicians promote individual patient welfare without becoming complicit in the perpetuation of unjust social norms?
Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (6):431-431 (2014)
In this issue, Ahmadi1 reports on the practice of hymenoplasty—a surgical intervention meant to restore a presumed physical marker of virginity prior to a woman's marriage. As Mehri and Sills2 have stated, these women ‘want to ensure that blood is spilled on their wedding night sheets.’ Although Ahmadi's research was carried out in Iran specifically, this surgery is becoming increasingly popular in a number of Western countries as well, especially among Muslim populations.3 What are the ethics of hymen restoration?Consider the role of the physician. Two of the doctors interviewed by Ahmadi reported being in ‘a perpetual state of guilt because of the surgery's inherent aim at deceiving the groom’ and noted their ‘personal conflict’ at being involved in this deception. Yet: "None of the doctors believed that the surgery was unethical, arguing that the girl could be ‘abused’ and ‘can even die’ if she is discovered not … "
|Keywords||Islam virginity social norms sexism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Ethical Issues in Hymenoplasty: Views From Tehran's Physicians.A. Ahmadi - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (6):429-430.
Enhancement.Thomas Murray - 2009 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Are There Morally Relevant Differences Between Hymen Restoration and Bloodless Treatment for Jehovah’s Witnesses?Niklas Juth & Niels Lynøe - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):89.
Similar books and articles
Transparent Trust and Oppression.Shay Welch - 2013 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (1):45-64.
Genetic Enhancement, Social Justice, and Welfare-Oriented Patterns of Distribution.Edwin Etieyibo - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (6):296-304.
From Separability to Unweighted Sum: A Case for Utilitarianism. [REVIEW]Yew-Kwang Ng - 2000 - Theory and Decision 49 (4):299-312.
Comparison of Patients' and Health Care Professionals' Attitudes Towards Advance Directives.D. Blondeau, P. Valois, E. W. Keyserlingk, M. Hebert & M. Lavoie - 1998 - Journal of Medical Ethics 24 (5):328-335.
Ethical Considerations in Cross-Linguistic Nursing.Franco A. Carnevale, Bilkis Vissandjée, Amy Nyland & Ariane Vinet-Bonin - 2009 - Nursing Ethics 16 (6):813-826.
Contractarianism and Interspecies Welfare Conflicts.Andrew I. Cohen - 2009 - Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (1):227-257.
'Cosmetic Neurology' and the Moral Complicity Argument.A. Ravelingien, J. Braeckman, L. Crevits, D. De Ridder & E. Mortier - 2009 - Neuroethics 2 (3):151-162.
David Schmidtz and Robert E. Goodin, Social Welfare and Individual Responsibility:Social Welfare and Individual Responsibility.Daniel J. Shapiro - 2000 - Ethics 110 (2):437-441.
Attitudes of Rhode Island Primary Care Physicians Toward the Use of Genetic Testing for Breast Cancer.Frances M. Alexakos - 2003 - Dissertation, Salve Regina University
Added to index2013-11-22
Total downloads188 ( #23,104 of 2,158,196 )
Recent downloads (6 months)48 ( #5,799 of 2,158,196 )
How can I increase my downloads?