Meta-surrogate decision making and artificial intelligence

Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (5):287-289 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How shall we decide for others who cannot decide for themselves? And who—or what, in the case of artificial intelligence — should make the decision? The present issue of the journal tackles several interrelated topics, many of them having to do with surrogate decision making. For example, the feature article by Jardas et al 1 explores the potential use of artificial intelligence to predict incapacitated patients’ likely treatment preferences based on their sociodemographic characteristics, raising questions about the means by which we come to decide for others. And a clinical ethics round table led by Wilkinson and Pillay2 examines the case of a premature baby on life support whose primary surrogate is herself incapacitated. Together, these examples force us to think more deeply about the meaning and significance of taken-for-granted concepts: respect for autonomy, substituted judgement, best interests. We’ll consider the baby first and then turn to AI. “Baby T” is a critically ill newborn delivered prematurely by emergency caesarean section. The mother had entered into a surrogacy arrangement with a same-sex male couple, the intended parents, who were to take over the baby’s care after birth—just as soon as a formal parental order could be obtained through the court. Until then, the birth mother, who had used her own eggs to conceive Baby T along with sperm from an unidentified donor, would have legal and ethical responsibility to decide about the baby’s care. Unfortunately, she too was in critical condition, having fallen unconscious prior to delivery due to a sudden brain haemorrhage. She remained unconscious, and thus incapacitated, during a crucial period in which time-sensitive decisions about Baby T’s care needed to be made, including whether to continue life support. Given the mother’s incapacity, who should …

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Surrogates and Artificial Intelligence: Why AI Trumps Family.Ryan Hubbard & Jake Greenblum - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (6):3217-3227.
A Mixed Judgment Standard for Surrogate Decision-Making.Nathan Stout - 2022 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 47 (4):540-548.
Computer-assisted decision making in medicine.A. Feigenbaum Edward - 1984 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (2).
Lectures on Inductive Logic.Jon Williamson - 2017 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
AI ethics and the banality of evil.Payman Tajalli - 2021 - Ethics and Information Technology 23 (3):447-454.
The Medical Surrogate as Fiduciary Agent.Dana Howard - 2017 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 45 (3):402-420.
Embodied artificial intelligence once again.Anna Sarosiek - 2017 - Philosophical Problems in Science 63:231-240.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-25

Downloads
26 (#524,350)

6 months
8 (#157,827)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brian D. Earp
University of Oxford