Computational reverse mathematics and foundational analysis

Authors
Benedict Eastaugh
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München
Abstract
Reverse mathematics studies which subsystems of second order arithmetic are equivalent to key theorems of ordinary, non-set-theoretic mathematics. The main philosophical application of reverse mathematics proposed thus far is foundational analysis, which explores the limits of different foundations for mathematics in a formally precise manner. This paper gives a detailed account of the motivations and methodology of foundational analysis, which have heretofore been largely left implicit in the practice. It then shows how this account can be fruitfully applied in the evaluation of major foundational approaches by a careful examination of two case studies: a partial realization of Hilbert’s program due to Simpson [1988], and predicativism in the extended form due to Feferman and Schütte. Shore [2010, 2013] proposes that equivalences in reverse mathematics be proved in the same way as inequivalences, namely by considering only omega-models of the systems in question. Shore refers to this approach as computational reverse mathematics. This paper shows that despite some attractive features, computational reverse mathematics is inappropriate for foundational analysis, for two major reasons. Firstly, the computable entailment relation employed in computational reverse mathematics does not preserve justification for the foundational programs above. Secondly, computable entailment is a Pi-1-1 complete relation, and hence employing it commits one to theoretical resources which outstrip those available within any foundational approach that is proof-theoretically weaker than Pi-1-1-CA0.
Keywords reverse mathematics  proof theory  omega-logic
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2018
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reverse Mathematics: The Playground of Logic.Richard A. Shore - 2010 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (3):378-402.
The Dirac Delta Function in Two Settings of Reverse Mathematics.Sam Sanders & Keita Yokoyama - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (1-2):99-121.
Reverse-Engineering Reverse Mathematics.Sam Sanders - 2013 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 164 (5):528-541.
Minima of Initial Segments of Infinite Sequences of Reals.Jeffry L. Hirst - 2004 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 50 (1):47-50.
Questioning Constructive Reverse Mathematics.I. Loeb - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 7 (2):131-140.
Reverse Mathematics and Ordinal Multiplication.Jeffry L. Hirst - 1998 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 44 (4):459-464.
Towards a Philosophy of Applied Mathematics.Christopher Pincock - 2009 - In Otávio Bueno & Øystein Linnebo (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Mathematics. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Reverse Formalism 16.Sanders Sam - forthcoming - Synthese:1-48.
Reverse Mathematics and Completeness Theorems for Intuitionistic Logic.Takeshi Yamazaki - 2001 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 42 (3):143-148.
Reverse Mathematics of Prime Factorization of Ordinals.Jeffry L. Hirst - 1999 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 38 (3):195-201.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-07-10

Total downloads
28 ( #232,306 of 2,302,576 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #36,186 of 2,302,576 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature