The Death of Darwinism and the Limits of Evolution

Philo 9 (2):193-220 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

George Holmes Howison’s 1895 essay entitled “The Limits of Evolution,” argued that there are four things evolutionary theory does not explain. In examining whether 11 decades have made a difference in these four, I argue that the arrogance of scientists over the past century in refusing to distinguish between full explanations and explanatory hypotheses is in some ways responsible for the fundamentalist backlash against evolutionary science. A scientific community that is honest and forthcoming about its limitations is to be sought. The best response to Intelligent Design, Creation Science, and other current trends in pseudoscience is to be very clear about the limits of evolutionary theory and the scope of scientific explanation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics and Evolution.Ursula Wolf - 2010 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 66 (3):577 - 586.
Universal darwinism and evolutionary social science.Richard R. Nelson - 2007 - Biology and Philosophy 22 (1):73-94.
Evolution: A Case of Stating the Obvious.Derek Hough - 1997 - Berkley Publishing Group.
Evolutionary theory and Victorian culture.Martin Fichman - 2002 - Amherst, N.Y.: Humanity Books.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
13 (#1,061,253)

6 months
5 (#703,779)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Randall E. Auxier
Southern Illinois University - Carbondale

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references