Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):580-586 (2004)

Esther Campbell
University of Bristol
Objectives: Although no genetic tests for violent behaviour are currently available, research is ongoing to isolate genes related to a propensity for violence. We explored the attitudes of parents and healthcare professionals toward behavioural genetic testing for violence.Design: The attitudes of healthcare professionals and the lay public about genetic testing of children were elicited for a range of conditions through interviews with healthcare professionals and focus groups with parents. All participants were informed that behavioural genetic testing was the only hypothetical genetic test in our script and it was presented as the last condition.Participants: The healthcare professionals included both genetic professionals and paediatricians. Focus group participants were recruited through various community institutions in the southside of Chicago and nearby suburbs.Results: The healthcare professionals tended to medicalise behavioural genetics, and were opposed to testing unless treatment was available. They were also uniformly concerned about the potential harms of this information, including unintentional adverse effects from environmental changes. In contrast, parents wanted genetic testing for behavioural traits to be available even in the absence of proved medical treatments. Not all parents wanted to test their own children, and some parents were concerned about self-fulfilling prophecies. Some parents, however, felt the information was important for their understanding, and could be used to support environmental changes.Conclusions: While healthcare professionals medicalised behavioural genetics, parents focused on environmental causes and influences. Consequently, healthcare professionals do not want to offer testing if there is no clear treatment, while parents may want this information to shape environmental influences.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2003.005389
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,107
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Genetic Testing in Children.E. W. Clayton - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (3):233-251.
Parentage Determination: A Medical Responsibility?Z. Stark & M. B. Delatycki - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (6):387-388.
Genetic Testing of Children for Late Onset Disease.Mary Ann Sevick, Donna G. Nativio & Terrance Mcconnell - 2005 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (1):47-56.
Genetic Testing of Children for Late Onset Disease.Mary Ann Sevick, Donna Nativio & Terrance Mcconnell - 2005 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 14 (1):47-56.


Added to PP index

Total views
6 ( #1,108,126 of 2,454,677 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,768 of 2,454,677 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes