Journal of Philosophy (forthcoming)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
A traditional view holds that the self-concept is essentially indexical. In a highly influential article, Ruth Millikan famously held that the self-concept should be understood as a Millian name with a sui generis functional role. This article presents a novel explanatory argument against the Millian view and in favor of the indexical view. The argument starts from a characterization of the self-concept as a device of information integration. It then shows that the indexical view yields a better explanation of the integration function than the Millian view. The resulting account can rebut Millikan’s objections and it has broader implications for the debate on the essential indexical.
|
Keywords | First person Essential indexical Mental indexicals Self |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Indexicals: What They Are Essential For.Olav Gjelsvik - 2017 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 60 (3):295-314.
Kapitan on Indexicals and Indexical Thought: A Retrospective.Matthew Babb - 2019 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 57 (2):279-294.
The Use-Conditional Indexical Conception of Proper Names.Dolf Rami - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (1):119-150.
Indexical Identification: A Perspectival Account.Tomis Kapitan - 2001 - Philosophical Psychology 14 (3):293 – 312.
XII—Why Are Indexicals Essential?Simon Prosser - 2015 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 115 (3_pt_3):211-233.
Frege On ‘I’, ‘Now’, ‘Today’ And Some Other Linguistic Devices.Edward Harcourt - 1999 - Synthese 121 (3):329-356.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-07-22
Total views
110 ( #89,792 of 2,409,924 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #18,431 of 2,409,924 )
2020-07-22
Total views
110 ( #89,792 of 2,409,924 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #18,431 of 2,409,924 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads