Cognitive Science 39 (7):1570-1593 (2015)

Is consolidation needed to account for retroactive interference in free recall? Interfering mental activity during the retention interval of a memory task impairs performance, in particular if the interference occurs in temporal proximity to the encoding of the to-be-remembered information. There are at least two rival theoretical accounts of this temporal gradient of retroactive interference. The cognitive neuroscience literature has suggested neural consolidation is a pivotal factor determining item recall. According to this account, interfering activity interrupts consolidation processes that would otherwise stabilize the memory representations of TBR items post-encoding. Temporal distinctiveness theory, by contrast, proposes that the retrievability of items depends on their isolation in psychological time. According to this theory, information processed after the encoding of TBR material will reduce the temporal distinctiveness of the TBR information. To test between these accounts, implementations of consolidation were added to the SIMPLE model of memory and learning. We report data from two experiments utilizing a two-list free recall paradigm. Modeling results imply that SIMPLE was able to model the data and did not benefit from the addition of consolidation. It is concluded that the temporal gradient of retroactive interference cannot be taken as evidence for memory consolidation
Keywords Temporal distinctiveness  Retroactive interference  SIMPLE  Consolidation  Free recall
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/cogs.12214
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,342
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Temporal Ratio Model of Memory.Gordon D. A. Brown, Ian Neath & Nick Chater - 2007 - Psychological Review 114 (3):539-576.
Memory for Serial Order.Stephan Lewandowsky & Bennet B. Murdock - 1989 - Psychological Review 96 (1):25-57.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Where is the Classic Interference Theory for Sleep and Memory?Anton Coenen - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):67-68.
The Role of Retroactive Interference and Consolidation in Everyday Forgetting.John T. Wixted - 2010 - In Sergio Della Sala (ed.), Forgetting. Psychology Press. pp. 285--312.
Retroactive Interference with Multiple Interpolated Lists.Judith Goggin - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (3p1):483.
An Investigation Into the Causes of Retroactive Interference.Charles E. Osgood - 1948 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (2):132.
Forced Stimulus Encoding and Retroactive Interference.Judith Goggin & Edwin Martin - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (1):131.


Added to PP index

Total views
17 ( #555,408 of 2,326,110 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #213,215 of 2,326,110 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes