Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):536-537 (2001)

Abstract
A profound problem in viewing operant learning as selection appears to be the identification of replicators. Given the lack of consensus on what constitutes the appropriate unit of analysis for behavior, there may be multiple levels at which the metaphor of selection may be usefully applied. A final difficulty: The elements of selection in the evolution of species are objects. In behavior, they are events.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x01304168
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,666
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Operant Selectionism Coherent?François Tonneau & Michel B. C. Sokolowski - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):558-559.
On the Origins of Complexity.Bruce E. Hesse & Gary Novak - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):540-541.
The Levels of Selection.Robert Brandon - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:315 - 323.
At Last: Serious Consideration.David L. Hull, Rodney E. Langman & Sigrid S. Glenn - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):559-569.
Selection Without Multiple Replicators?John W. Pepper & Thorbjørn Knudsen - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):550-551.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
11 ( #770,369 of 2,349,173 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #511,414 of 2,349,173 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes