Emotion Review 5 (3):275-279 (2013)

This article reviews evidence suggesting that the cause of approach and avoidance behavior lies not so much in the presence (i.e., the stimulus) but, rather, in the behavior’s anticipated future consequences (i.e., the goal): Approach is motivated by the goal to produce a desired consequence or end-state, while avoidance is motivated by the goal to prevent an undesired consequence or end-state. However, even though approach and avoidance are controlled by goals rather than stimuli, affective stimuli can influence action control by priming associated goals. An integrative ideomotor model of approach and avoidance is presented and discussed
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1754073913477505
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,417
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

On the Self-Regulation of Behavior.Charles S. Carver - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
Learned Helplessness: Theory and Evidence.Steven F. Maier & Martin E. Seligman - 1976 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 105 (1):3-46.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
21 ( #514,378 of 2,449,084 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #442,577 of 2,449,084 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes